• Home
  • Music
  • Film
  • Tentrax
  • Contact
Menu

No Wave

  • Home
  • Music
  • Film
  • Tentrax
  • Contact
jojinectar.jpg

Joji—Nectar

88rising/12Tone, Sep. 2020

Joji—Nectar

September 25, 2020

The career renaissance of George Kusunoki Miller surprised everyone—none more than Miller himself. He cut his teeth in risqué youtube satire as “Filthy Frank”, a defiantly un-PC amalgam of the worst that humankind has to offer. Miller preached hateful rhetoric with such gusto that its absurdities were thrown into a revealing light. Something about the project transcended shock value or leftist critique—it seemed as though Miller was exorcising his own profane demons, confronting his audience with secret, forbidden, but ever-present ideas that they would otherwise self-censor.

For this reason, despite its extremity, there was a sincere vein running through Filthy Frank. Arguably, the project revealed more about Miller than his more recent hustle in neo-soul as Joji. Miller’s music was once his most closely-guarded secret—but the only thing scandalous about it was its expectation that we see him more as man than meme.

Nectar, Joji’s first album, relaxes into conformity. Its lyrics are emotionally raw—but calculated in their universality. An intentional distance is created between Joji and his listeners through muffly and subdued production (think ‘lo fi hip hop radio – beats to study / relax to’). No corners are too sharp. While this doesn’t obfuscate Joji’s intent or individuality, it does slightly deaden his music’s impact.

Exceptions include ‘Run’ and ‘Tick Tock’, tracks which add welcome variety to Nectar’s 18-song tracklist. ‘Run’, an unashamed power ballad, is perhaps the only song here which allows Joji to really cut loose as a singer. It’s frankly surprising he has such a voice in him—the breathy, bedroom-performer approach he takes elsewhere feels like it’s disguising a lack of ability. And ‘Tick Tock’ is quite bizarre; a fence-sitter between banger and ballad, it samples Nelly’s ‘Dilemma’ to ghostly—albeit comical—effect.

For the most part, Nectar’s songs are rather more timid. It feels like Joji and his musical peers find inspiration in Marvin Gaye’s revolutionarily and singular whispery timbre. Perhaps a more likely inspiration is Lana Del Rey. Either way, the gentle emotiveness of their voices suggests a mood rather than forcing it. But—and this should shock nobody—none of these vocalists has Gaye or Del Rey’s range, versatility, or character. The result is a kind of bedroom-soul; a melancholic and lonely genre too scared to walk the streets, instead looking at them through a closed window or a laptop screen. Soul once celebrated in the face of sadness and adversity—neo-soul cleans up after the celebration; it sounds like emptying ashtrays, crushing cans, rustling binbags on a hungover morning.

Perhaps this narcotic effect results from listening to Nectar straight through. The album’s length is likely a tactic to maximise Spotify streams—not the result of some unifying theme or album-wide concept. Nectar feels intended to be listened to piecemeal; one track at a time, or shuffled. That’s for sure how its demographic, raised on the ephemerality of streaming services, consume music. It therefore feels disingenuous to knock points off for the album’s fatiguing effect, even though that’s somewhat tied up in its manner of presentation.

Joji’s greatest strength seems to be a lack of vanity—he has welcomed a host of guest producers and vocal features, all of whom are used very well. Lil Yachty in particular is surprisingly well-deployed, taking to Joji’s sadboy aesthetic like a fish to water. There has been a suggestion that by bringing on so many personnel, Joji’s playing sideman to his collaborators—but Nectar’s tracks feel too consistent in both tone and quality for that to be true.

Nectar is a passable effort which frustratingly fails to take off. Flickers of talent burst through its runtime—but Joji doesn’t have the confidence to follow his best ideas yet. In future releases, more risks will hopefully be taken—perhaps Joji can channel some of the courage he used when dressing up in a pink morph suit and antagonising members of the public for pranks. That this album plays things safe will no doubt earn it the label ‘commercial’—but this is a rather meaningless and unhelpful term. The same tastemakers levelling this accusation probably praised Solange’s releases on Columbia Records. If anything, Nectar emblemises a rags-to-riches story. Very few had even heard of 88rising a few years back—now they’re huge. Joji has blurred the line between superstar and next-door neighbour more comprehensively than anyone before him. Whether that’s a good or a bad thing simply depends on your outlook.

Nectar can be purchased on all formats here.

Words: Andrew O’Keefe

In Review Tags Pop, Neo-soul, R&B
yaeji.jpg

Yaeji—WHAT WE DREW 우리가 그려왔던

XL Recordings, Apr. 2020

Yaeji—WHAT WE DREW 우리가 그려왔던

April 11, 2020

Yaeji seemed to appear fully-formed, with no knock and no doorbell, as one of the most charismatic vocalists and producers working. Her instantly recognisable style—which reframes New York as an incorporeal and impossibly chilled place—now welcomes a full-length mixtape, WHAT WE DREW 우리가 그려왔던, to its canon.

WHAT WE DREW… carries over the melancholic humour of Yaeji’s previous releases. Lead single ‘WAKING UP DOWN’ is catchy enough that its lyrical strength is easy to overlook. Beneath the track’s propulsive veneer, the comic defeatism of Morrissey scatters the ground—heightening both the absurdity and need of dancing through your pain. And, unlike Morrissey, Yaeji seems like someone who’d be a blast to hang out with.

Perhaps this is part of the problem. Coasting on her irresistible appeal, Yaeji’s vocals are one of the few elements which don’t feel like they’ve been tweaked in the three years since EP2. Some multi-track layering and reverb on the mixtape’s title track add a fresh feeling of dreaminess—but these effects are de-emphasised, even lost, in the mix. It feels as though the producer is struggling to step from the shadow of her acclaim; innovations and fresh takes hidden behind the safe and familiar.

Some collaborations try to break the spell too—but their quality is inconsistent and at worst dire. ‘FREE INTERLUDE’ is freestyled to a fault. Lil Fayo, trenchcoat, and Sweet Pea prove it’s difficult to do “that Yaeji thing”, contributing lyrics which are neither as charming nor witty as anyone wanted them to be (except maybe “a cheech has a sturple”). The result is studio outtake material which recalls the worst of classic hip-hop skits—and, more criminally, is a waste of a great beat.

Maybe this is a limitation of the form; you can’t release a mixtape without a few collaborations. But these collaborations subtract from WHAT WE DREW… more often than they add.

These problems wouldn’t be felt as keenly without the radical changes Yaeji makes to her instrumentation. Synthesisers have a new brightness and wonderful analogue feeling; intimate and crystalline, where previously they’d have been distant and murky. Compositions are driven by chords and melodies as often as they are by beats. And sometimes, as in the breaks of ‘IN THE MIRROR 거울’, even these beats are revised, revolutionised, searching new territories.  

WHAT WE DREW… has, then, one foot in the future, another stuck in the mire of the past. And you can forgive this of a mixtape—its “unofficial” status (on a major label nonetheless) meant to signify the project as throwaway, thrown-together, messy and transitional. It’s just a shame it took three years to arrive.

WHAT WE DREW 우리가 그려왔던 is available for purchase and streaming here.

Words: Andrew O’Keefe

In Review Tags Electronic, Dance, House, Pop
losing, linda.jpg

Sui Zhen — Losing, Linda

Cascine, Sep. 2019

Sui Zhen — Losing, Linda

September 15, 2019

In Losing, Linda, Sui Zhen probes animism in the immaterial world. 'Linda' is the subject of the album's cover, a grotesque and rubberised approximation of Zhen. She impresses a dark, half-formed online identity — the ghost that we, the living, assemble to leave here. This is something marketers tellingly call a 'presence'.

Behind the mask is choreographer Megan Payne, in a further explosion of identity. Identity crises are no new ground in music, but Zhen explores them with refreshing contemporaneity. If Death Grips were the first post-internet band, propelled upwards by memes and ARGs, Zhen goes a step further. She is among the first to so fully discuss the internet’s Derridean spectrality, its power to fragment the individual.

Opener 'Another Life' gets the most often-discussed existential terror of the internet out of the way. It's a slow, ethereal, exploration of the innate FOMO of the online experience. Its chorus hook, 'all I see are things that I could be missing / all I know are things from another life', ought to hit home for any one of facebook's 2.41 billion monthly active users.

The effects of this phenomenon extend into the real world, too. Gig attendees will be familiar with the obsessive documentation of the 21st century. They've either craned their neck around a hovering device, its bright screen a smear of the world, or filmed a performance on one. Whatever one's perspective on this practice, it has inarguably altered our relationship with the present. This is epitomised in the sinister online aphorism 'pics or it didn't happen'.

And throughout Losing, Linda, Sui Zhen emphasises this incorporeal floatiness that physical reality has caught. 'Different Places' is a wistful, dub-inflected piece that feels adrift in the air. It lives in and explores distances between people, with koan-like lyrics that reveal as much as they mystify. 'I Could Be There' is a ballad with one foot in the past; like a strange, sorrowful piece of city pop remixed by Clams Casino. It feels like something that would stalk the quiet halls of youtube, awaiting the day it’s recommended to millions, heaved back from the forgotten past into new life.

Anti-natalism and biodegradable coffins betray a modern desire to leave no physical trace. Yet we are increasingly commemorated by our online presences, doppelgängers which will breathe as long as the servers do. Losing, Linda is, then, a ghost story for 2019; the story of our collective self-haunting. It's a generous work which deepens in meaning and grows in beauty with every listen.

Pre-order and stream tracks from Losing, Linda here. Album due September 27th.

Words by Andrew O’Keefe

In Review Tags Electronic, Pop
sirwas.jpg

sirWas — Holding On To A Dream

Memphis Industries, Sep. 2019

sirWas — Holding On To A Dream

September 7, 2019

sirWas' Holding On To A Dream, in its titling and its first few moments, threatens forty minutes of mawkish cheese. The album, out of the gate, has an easy affability, with unchallenging compositions. But it's not long before that surface slips.

A wave of melancholy recontextualises the album's title. ‘Holding On To A Dream’ isn't a faux-inspirational Instragram truism. It's the sigh of someone at the end of their tether, ready to leave the dream outside, shake themselves dry of it, and move on.

The album's arrival at the end of summer enriches its doleful beauty. The beach barbecue is over. This is for the last dying embers under the grill, lonely beacons in the sunset. Holding On To A Dream is uncommonly self-aware. The album's suggestion it will soon fade, crumble, and be erased by time is, ironically, the very thing that keeps it stuck in your head.

It shares DNA and gloom-driven grooviness with Frank Ocean's blond. Stand-out track 'Somewhere' features some distorted vocals reminiscent of blond's 'Self Control', in a liminal space between voice and guitar; between two sets of strings running down two necks, the organic and the artificial. 'Somewhere' has a refreshing sense of progression and hope that many of the static jams of Holding On To A Dream lack.

Holding On To A Dream is a work both personable and personal. Its lyrics are confessions, and like many confessions they are obscured behind qualifiers, distractions, bids for approval and friendliness. But that doesn't make them any less compelling. It just makes them easier to hear.

Holding On To A Dream will be released on September 20th. Pre-order and stream tracks here.

Words by Andrew O’Keefe

In Review Tags Pop, Lo-fi, Neo-soul
practiceoflove.jpg

Jenny Hval — The Practice of Love

Sacred Bones Records, Sep. 2019

Jenny Hval — The Practice of Love

August 21, 2019

Jenny Hval's albums are often like manifestos. Her free-verse lyrics, on a page, read like paragraphs of some pontificating, noncommittal dissertation. But Hval's delivery has always granted them magic. A wave of sensuality crushes all that is ostentatious in her work.

She is the hub that houses her own spokes, the point at which all her antithetical ideas collide. In anyone else's hands, her material would be treading on its own toes. But she has a knack for carrying it all off. Hval, if not an intellectual, has always been a juggler of ideas.

And in recent years, Hval the songwriter has come to the fore. With last year's The Long Sleep, she released 'Spells' — her most warm and welcoming track to date. The EP as a whole represented Hval's most successful marriage of concept and material, seizing the mantle from its vampiric predecessor Blood Bitch. It even found space for one of her trademark spoken-word sections in a touching coda.

The Practice of Love further emphasises this talent for songwriting. Eschewing extended drones and sound collages, it instead unveils hit after hit of electro-inflected art-pop. Hval has also drawn in a crew of collaborators, most notably the striking and powerful vocals of Vivian Wang. Hval’s now-fragmented voice swells the album beyond vanity-project-chinstroking, and into cabbalistic beauty.

But things haven't leapt completely off-world. Hval's admirable, slightly clumsy, directness is still present. Discussion is sometimes so frank it touches embarrassment — like overhearing arguments or sex through the wall. She is an artist who can make you blush, shake your head in confusion and laugh while being overwhelmed by beauty.

On The Practice of Love, Hval says she took influence from 'trashy, mainstream trance music from the 90s'. But this album adopts the spectre of vaporwave, and contorts its influences into something full of yearning. The ancient, artifacted JPEGs; the jumble of disconnected visual noise. It has the airiness and wonder of nostalgia, but feels fiercely contemporary.

Hval probes further into herself with every release, exploring, revealing, peeling back layers of identity to find new masks beneath. And after every internal expedition, she returns with a greater treasure. The Practice of Love is her greatest yet.

The Practice of Love is released on Sept. 13th. Pre-order the album and stream its singles here.

Words by Andrew O’Keefe

In Review Tags Electronic, Pop, Spoken Word
Older Posts →