• Home
  • Music
  • Film
  • Tentrax
  • Contact
Menu

No Wave

  • Home
  • Music
  • Film
  • Tentrax
  • Contact
jojo rabbit.jpg

Jojo Rabbit

Dir. Taika Waititi, Jan. 2020

Jojo Rabbit

January 12, 2020

Roberto Benigni’s Life is Beautiful—the recipient of three Academy Awards—was, and remains to this day, a contentious piece. The 1997 film follows Guido (Benigni), a father who shields his son from the horrors of Auschwitz by pretending that their detention is an elaborate game. Among the film’s most famous detractors was Mel Brooks, who had thirty years earlier directed The Producers—a film which itself satirised Adolf Hitler.

Brooks said in a Der Spiegel interview: ‘Americans were incredibly thrilled to discover from [Benigni] it wasn’t all that bad in the concentration camps after all. And that’s why they immediately pressed an Oscar into his hand.’

Benigni, a gentile, could not understand that in Auschwitz, tenderness and humanity were non-existent. There was no refuge, no pretence to hide behind. The idea of hope existing within the walls of a concentration camp was seen by Benigni’s detractors as a misunderstanding of the mechanics of the Holocaust; a fabrication. Elie Wiesel wrote in Night, ‘We were incapable of thinking. Our senses were numbed, everything was fading into a fog. We no longer clung to anything. The instincts of self-preservation, of self-defense, of pride, had all deserted us.’

The Holocaust is the most visceral manifestation of the Nazi state of exception—and existed within its own walled world. Auschwitz had its own traffic court for military vehicles which ran red lights within the camp. But even outside, far away, Nazi society was defined at every level by these camps.

Taika Waititi’s Jojo Rabbit takes place outside and far away—an idyllic German town, ancillary to the horrors of the Holocaust. Denizens are investigated by the SS and instructed to report their suspicions to authorities. Everything exists in service of exterminating those who cannot be integrated into Nazi society, but distance is largely maintained from the extermination itself. The exception is some gruesome public hangings in the town square.

It’s funny—where Life is Beautiful took flack for its proximity to the site of extermination, Jojo Rabbit has been decried as too soft, whimsical and distant from such traumas. While it would be remiss of an anti-facist film to adhere to a rulebook of how-not-to-do-things, let’s humour the detractors for a moment. Nazis in the film seem incapable of committing a genocide. They’re incompetent, mesmerised, vulnerable; the town itself beautifully decorated, warmly lensed. But Jojo Rabbit provides a reason for this in its titular character.

Jojo is a ten-year-old boy who dreams of meeting Hitler—one who keeps a spot unoccupied as his best friend for Hitler to eventually fill—and is given fatherly advice by an imaginary version of the dictator. He is a vessel, full to the brim of Nazi ideology, and in bitter conflict with his own good nature. Jojo is our eyes, our navigator through this world of confusion.

The simplicity of childhood is easily exploited. A canny parallel is drawn early on between Hitlerian fanaticism and Beatlemania, as Jojo meets the day intoxicated with excitement to serve his cool Führer. Nazi propaganda is accompanied by The Beatles’ own German recording of ‘I Wanna Hold Your Hand’, ‘Komm Gib Mir Deine Hand’. Jojo and his friends are filled with joy at the prospect of murdering Jews—the bogeymen of their ghost stories. Detractors have described these scenes as flippant or cutesy, but they are in fact incredibly effective and sinister.

Jojo has been seduced by propaganda and chest-thumping ideology past the point of critical analysis. He is treated with nothing but cruelty and judgement by the aforementioned peers—but he still chooses them over a mother who grants him love and acceptance. Her sympathies lie with the victims of the Nazi regime; she sees no glory in war, but pointless violence and death. The character—the heart of the film—is beautifully played by Scarlett Johansson, in a turn which recalls the effortless glamour of Golden Age movie stars.

Jojo and his mother’s political dinner-table spats resemble something altogether more contemporary, in a world where algorithms funnel us into sinkholes of our worst, most fearful impulses. Righteousness feels good, and confusion is frightening. But a generalised sense of moral absolutism has never led to anything worthwhile.

Jojo’s absolutism is tested when he meets a Jew for the first time in Elsa (a wonderful Thomasin McKenzie). A slow erosion of Jojo’s Nazism soon begins. The film reflects this by disintegrating, disrupting, and demolishing its setting in the final act; the facade of Bavarian beauty crumbling to reveal the bloodshed supporting it. To say any more would be to reveal too much of this film’s conceit. Suffice to say, it’s probably going where you think it is.

If Jojo Rabbit seems unconcerned with the nitty-gritty of World War Two’s cruelties—well, that’s because it’s not about them. It’s a coming-of-age story, as Jojo realises the world isn’t as cut-and-dry as he thought. Adulthood is an opening, a broadening of things. A realisation that both fear and love can be misplaced, even when they feel overwhelmingly strong. One heartbreaking moment in Jojo Rabbit underlines this, to remind us of what we truly cannot live without. You’ll know it when you get to it.

Words by Andrew O’Keefe

In Review Tags Comedy, Coming-of-age, Period
doctorsleep.jpg

Doctor Sleep

Dir. Mike Flanagan, Nov. 2019

Doctor Sleep

November 2, 2019

Rodney Ascher's 2012 documentary, Room 237, examines a litany of perspectives on Stanley Kubrick's The Shining. One interviewee even claims the film is a confession by Kubrick to a moon-landing hoax. It comes as no surprise that Room 237 got eyes rolling — even Stephen King's. But its aim was never to legitimise its talking heads' analyses. It instead exposed how eccentric and single-minded readings of Kubrick's film can get.

Nearly forty years have passed since the release of The Shining. Age has not diminished the film's power, its sense of mystery, or its uncanny and sickly tone. News of a sequel was, in consequence, met with trepidation. But Doctor Sleep, based on a King sequel of the same name, does not tarnish the original film's legacy.

The film's tone is one of quiet dread. Moments when its spring uncoils are few and far between — but this lends them incredible weight. The construction of this film's horror is near-impeccable, supported by impressive scoring and cinematography. Doctor Sleep is far from the train-wreck many feared — but it's orthodox, shallow, and risk-averse. It would be impossible to make a case for this film having anything to do with the moon landing.

Doctor Sleep is, for better or worse, a film in the spirit of King's novels. It speaks with the author's moralising, materialism and tendency towards sentiment. In Kubrick's film, the ghosts of the Overlook were flesh and blood; lit and blocked like the living. Their goals and hungers were undefinable. The antagonists of Doctor Sleep are vampires who dress and move like a carnival troupe, eyes glowing an empty blue. Its protagonists, by contrast, are good, pure, X-Men style psychics. Even the shining itself is now material, a ghostly smoke floating from mouths of its holders.

These features pose no significant problems in the first two acts of Doctor Sleep. The film does a decent job of drawing you into this new world, and manages to transcend the cheesiness of its concept. But its finale feels no more than a homage to Kubrick's iconic imagery. The Overlook involutes; a superficial ghost-train, shell of its former self. Kubrick's Shining was a hauntological exercise; King and director Mike Flanagan's Overlook is something more straight-laced. It's horror which can be understood; overcome. Its ghosts can be willed out of existence, locked in mental boxes; manipulated and used as strategic pieces.

The subtlety and strangeness of Kubrick's film is abandoned. Doctor Sleep treads the same ground, exploring the same themes in a more explicable way. In their new clarity, though, those themes are greatly diminished.

Doctor Sleep is in cinemas now.

Words by Andrew O’Keefe

The World Will Shine Again. "Stephen King's Doctor Sleep" Only in Theaters November 8. ------- http://DoctorSleepMovie.com https://www.facebook.com/doctorsleepmovie/ https://www.twitter.com/DoctorSleepFilm https://www.instagram.com/DoctorSleepMovie ------- "Doctor Sleep" continues the story of Danny Torrance, 40 years after his terrifying stay at the Overlook Hotel in The Shining.

In Review Tags Horror, Thriller
in+fabric.jpg

In Fabric

Dir. Peter Strickland, Jun. 2019

In Fabric

October 20, 2019

The UK defines itself cinematically by kitchen-sink social realism. By presenting us as a rainy and loveless land, the works of Mike Leigh and Cleo Barnard export well to Europe. And Ken Loach's I, Daniel Blake scored the director his second Palme D'Or, an honour only seven others share. Even our television is aggressively dour. A visiting alien would think the UK contained only police officers, struggling single mothers and bailiffs. A few chefs, too. The whole thing is shot through with social conservativism and ‘poor cow’ commiserations.

Beneath this, however, has bubbled a long-standing tradition of experimentation and Gothic beauty. Britain's most iconic horror film, The Wicker Man, represents these two battling modes quite well. Woodward's Sergeant Howie is a moral absolutist, a terse and joyless Catholic. By contrast, the denizens of Summerisle are self-determined and sexually expressive. Howie's bullheadedness blinds him from the truth: pagan idolatry built the British Isles. His own credo, the institution he represents, are themselves perversions of a much deeper and older system of belief.

Ken Russell and Terry Gilliam are legendary figures in British film. But discussion around them is so often bashful, self-deprecating and tinged with shame. We have a national inability to face our own blood-drenched past.

In recent years, and especially with the foundation of Ben Wheatley's Rook Films, experimentation in narrative British cinema has been reinvigorated. Focus has returned from the tree to its gnarled roots. Sensuality and silliness has found its space again. A beleaguered public is rediscovering the escapism of film.

The latest from Rook, Peter Strickland's In Fabric, is set in Thames Valley. Anyone who lives there will attest to it being grey, corporate and consumerist. The entire region is, put simply, the admin department of the City of London. Not an obvious playground for Strickland's seductive, magical, and somewhat arch style.

But In Fabric rifles to the back of the wardrobe. It finds and lays bare the absurdity of shopping centres, dating, washing machine repair — you name it. The mundanities of life are cast into sharp relief, reframed, and given colour. Rather than bemoan our lot, In Fabric chuckles dryly to itself. The emotional intensity of Strickland's craft is still here. But it takes a backseat to what can only be described as 'John Waters does giallo'.

In an impressive balancing act, the film never descends into farce. Even a final-act setpiece involving a blasting siren is oddly mournful and horrific. Great performances across the board carry the film's more outrageous twists through. And a wonderful score by Cavern of Anti-Matter climaxes with such power and gusto you'll cover your ears and strain to listen at the same time.

By the way, it's about a dress that murders people.

See #InFabric In Cinemas & On Curzon Home Cinema Find out more at: https://www.curzon.com/in-fabric The latest from the unique imagination of Peter Strickland, IN FABRIC is a typically distinctive and haunting tale that blends Giallo-infused horror with absurdist dark humour, to ghostly effect.


In Fabric is available to rent and buy now.

Words by Andrew O’Keefe

In Review Tags Horror, Comedy
joker.jpg

Joker

Dir. Todd Phillips, Oct. 2019

Joker

October 10, 2019

Similarities conjoin the subjects of Todd Phillips' debut film (Hated: GG Allin and the Murder Junkies) and his most recent, Joker. Allin was an agitative outcast who violated both himself and others. His striking image was no costume — rather his own sickly marrow surfaced and slathered over flesh. He engaged in suicidal ideations, with a long-term desire to commit suicide on stage. Allin's art and on-stage persona accrued a following of social lepers and self-described scumbags who, through him, lived a form of vicarious rebellion. 'He's doing something,' spoke a Hated talking head, 'a lot of people wish they had the fuckin' balls to do.'

A palpable fear stalked the U.S. release of Joker. The site of 2012's Aurora theatre shooting refused to screen the film, and security tightened in cinemas across the country. Copycats seemed poised to pounce. But in places where mass shootings are not treated like societal punctuation, tensions simmered far lower. Joker is an incendiary and ambiguous film. But, like Allin, it is too nihilistic and obscene to incite violent action. At worst, it permits space for unwholesome fantasies. But really, it's a pussycat — any fear-mongering you may have read is baseless and idiotic.

So where does discomfort surrounding Joker come from? Previous treatments tendered an amoral, symbolic force. Through Heath Ledger's cracked lips the Joker once said, 'I just do things.' Joaquin Phoenix's read, by contrast, is a character whose unsound means serve sane motivations. Audiences must reckon with their own immoral wants and uncomfortable complicity. But all Joker really does is provide the character with hitherto absent motivation and depth. It doesn't feed you the manifesto of a mass shooter.

Yes, Arthur Fleck is a beat-down, luckless dope transformed and made whole through violence. But Phillips' script muddies the specifics of Fleck's past, and refuses to pin his transgressions on one cause. All that's clear is that Fleck is selfish, embittered and apolitical. This is the story of one individual self-actualising. In buoyant scenes Arthur dances and applies makeup to embody his own anima. But when the film depicts his other triumphs, it is in an ironic and uncomfortable mode.

Arthur’s journey is, underneath it all, tragic. He attributes his sorry lot to the wrong victims. He acts in rash confusion and rage. And he misidentifies short-term bursts of bloody gratification as his life's zenith. The film's coda suggests a return to violence — all he has divined is how to scratch an itch that will now forever return.

Where Joker stumbles is in its integration of existing comic-book lore. In Arthur's world, Batman seems a preposterous concept. The Wayne family's few scenes are without exception jarring, and occupy time which would have better served Robert De Niro's interesting-but-underwritten Murray Franklin. It's small-fry, though, for a film which is subtler, smarter and more artful than many would have you believe.

Words by Andrew O’Keefe

In Review Tags Drama, Horror
Untitled.jpg

La salvación de la Gacela Imperial

Dir. Pablo Picco

La salvación de la Gacela Imperial

June 4, 2019

The gentle lap of waves opens La salvación de la Gacela Imperial, set to continue through to its finish. Froth and foam fill the screen. The harbour bell tolls from behind. In the first of many influences to come, we can detect the ghost of Stan Brakhage. The roll of waves is distorted almost to the point of non-being; a sheet of watery static. The film will begin, but first it must be conjured and brought forth from the fog of abstraction.

We wash ashore, where Aarturi Toro is being charged by Ganesha with a holy mission. The nature of this mission is for viewers to discover themselves. Suffice to say Toro is soon on an overseas voyage, telescope in hand. It's simple, story-book fare, which allows the film's technical aspects to take the spotlight.

We travel through as many animation techniques as distant lands. Live action footage, stills, cut-outs, and back projection all combine into a stylish whole. But the film is never flashy — instead, it's fluid and clear. Scenes are often presented in profile, recalling Walerian Borowczyk, or Terry Gilliam in his work for Monty Python. And like those two forebears, it has a dark, wry, unusual sense of humour. Charm and menace are holding hands here.

It also dips into the grotesque, using close-ups of disembodied hands, eyes and tongues; even, at one point, reanimating a dead fish. Jan Svankmejer is a clear and welcome source of inspiration for these scenes, which are well interwoven with the film's more conventionally beautiful images.

One such image is an underwater jaunt on the back of a friendly axolotl. The screen is awash with deep black silhouettes and vibrant seascapes. The sound in the scene is outstanding, too, the axolotl's sweet cry like an old friend's greeting. The animals, elements, and the natural world appear as they would on the walls of a child's room. They are full of life and full of wonder — but ready to turn dangerous as soon as the nightlight's off.

Brakhage, Gilliam, Boro and Svankmajer have cropped up so far. But namedropping these influences does a disservice to what is an original and unique film. There are recognisable aesthetic qualities to La salvación..., but it has an eerie disjuncture and sense of humour all of its own. A journey worth taking.

A trailer for La salvación de la Gacela Imperial can be found here.

Words by Andrew O’Keefe

In Review Tags Animation, Surrealism
us.jpg

Us

Dir. Jordan Peele, Mar. 2019

Us

March 30, 2019

“Once upon a time, there was a girl — and the girl had a shadow.”

Read More
In Review Tags Horror, Comedy
C9C45C9D-24CE-4D9E-AE47-6AD9F985ADC1.jpg

Piercing

Dir. Nicolas Pesce, Feb. 2019

Piercing

March 5, 2019

“Can we eat first?”

Read More
In Review Tags Horror, Comedy
beale street.jpg

If Beale Street Could Talk

Dir. Barry Jenkins, Feb. 2019

If Beale Street Could Talk

February 20, 2019

“Love brought you here. If you trusted love this far, don't panic now. Trust it all the way…”

Read More
In Review Tags Drama, Romance, Crime
happy-new-year-colin-burstead_1200-700x700.jpg

Happy New Year, Colin Burstead

Dir. Ben Wheatley, Jan. 2019

Happy New Year, Colin Burstead

January 29, 2019

“You’re the only person who has to try not to ruin something.”

Read More
In Review Tags Comedy, Drama, Social Realist
the favourite.jpg

The Favourite

Dir. Yorgos Lanthimos, Jan. 2019

The Favourite

January 26, 2019

“Look at me, look at me! How dare you? Close your eyes!”

Read More
In Review Tags Period Drama, Comedy
← Newer Posts